As you build a base of coals in the smaller Bonfire it becomes more difficult to position a log below the upper rim of the fire pit, which is necessary for a clean, smokeless burn. This is due to the height you have to work with on the Bonfire. Standard 16” split logs will fit into both of these fire pits, however, smaller logs are typically better for the Bonfire. Over time, this causes wear on the welds and materials where a failure can result. These smokeless fire pits reach very high temperatures and as a result, the steel moves. The point is with the smaller Bonfire, you’re less likely to run into issues. We have not had any issues with the Solo Stoves we have been testing. Since then, they have re-designed the grate. Several years ago Solo Stove had issues with the grate failing. Where this is significant is with the elevated grate that the logs sit on. Our experience wasn’t anything out of the ordinary as several other owners have reported the same thing on forums and social media groups. When we used the 30” Yukon there was an issue with the upper ring severely warping after several uses. This may be one of the reasons Solo Stove decreased the size of the Yukon from 30” in diameter to 27” in 2020. With the smaller Bonfire, you are likely to run into fewer issues over time than with the Yukon. This concept applies to the Bonfire and Yukon too. This can result in more defective products where a certain specification is ‘out-of-tolerance’. Typically, the bigger a product is, the greater the variation in materials. When designing a product the term ‘tolerance stack’ refers to the accumulation of variances across materials and parts. Check out some of the notes at the end of this article so you know other factors that should be considered if you decide to perform this experiment yourself. Your own individual experience will likely vary greatly. This was far from a perfect test and there was a lot of noise in the numbers. But this at least gives you a frame of reference for how much more the Yukon uses. Of course, this will vary greatly based on the wood you use, how big you like to keep your fire, and a number of other factors. Here are both the Bonfire and Yukon Solo Stoves with a bed of coals built prior to starting the test. To fuel the Yukon for the same time frame, you’ll be better off purchasing a full cord at that point (1 full cord = 3 face cords), which will cost around $300 for most hardwoods. 1,235lbs for the Bonfire.Ī face cord of wood weighs about 1,200 lbs.Īssuming a face cord costs around $100-$150, that’s what the cost will work out to be for the Bonfire. If you have one fire a week for 4 hours for 4 months out of the year, you’ll need approximately 2,800 lbs of wood to fuel the Yukon, vs. The data was tabulated and according to the numbers, the Yukon burned 19.3lbs more wood per hour than the Bonfire. We weighed the remaining wood that had not been burned for the Bonfire’s stack. At about two hours in, the Yukon burned through its entire stack of wood. We continued to feed the fire to maintain this level for two hours and tracked how much wood we used. Then we fed the fires from each stack of wood until there was an adequate fire. With each stack, we made sure to remove as much bark as possible. We created two stacks of firewood, each weighing 88lbs and 88.4lbs for the Bonfire and Yukon respectively. In our tests, we started fires in both the Bonfire and Yukon and allowed them to burn until they had roughly equal coal beds. On average, you will use 22% more firewood per hour with the Yukon. There is a significant difference in the consumption of firewood between these two fire pits. Solo Stove Bonfire vs Yukon – What Matters? Wood Consumption Performance and your willingness to spend more or less money is where these factors really start to matter. The design is nearly identical with the exception of the obvious size difference. Regardless of the size you choose, both fire pits are made from the same 304 stainless steel material.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |